I suspect protecting the giver would help a bit in such situations, but only a bit, since delay given the way the indian state functions is difficult to characterise as harassment. Under the current law, discussed in some detail in the next section, once a bribe is given, the bribe giver and the bribe taker become partners in crime. If caught, the bribe giver will go scot free and will be able to collect his bribe money back. The chief economic adviser even says where bribery is proved in court, the bribe should be returned to the giver. Jan 31, 2007 both should be punished equally becaise on one hand the bribe taker is taking bribe which is obviously the wrong thing to do and on the other hand the bribe giver is giving bribe and increasing the morale of the bribe taker. The order was passed by the court of special judge, assam, m. Basu basu, 2011 suggested punishing only bribe takers in the case of harassment bribe will encourage citizens to act as whistleblowers and hence would cut down incidents of bribery incidents. Knowing that this will happen, the bribe taker will be deterred from taking a bribe. Bribery a game theoretic approach doubt everything. It is in their joint interest to keep this fact hidden from the authorities and to. While the bribe taker is painted in the darkest of colours, the bribe giver the one who has the resources to pay bribes is treated as the victim of the exercise. It should be emphasized that what is being argued in this paper is not a retrospective pardon for bribe. Kaushik basu says make bribe giving legal india real time wsj. But they allowed the wheels of justice to move terribly slowly where the bribe takers were concerned.
The fight against corruption will never be won if we continue distinguishing the bribe. Dec 31, 2012 observing that treating both the bribe taker and the bribe giver as liable for corruption creates a large disincentive for citizens to report the transaction, basu proposed that the law should be amended so that only the bribe recipient is liable and prosecuted whereas the giver is offered impunity. But, prof basu argues, if you make bribe giving legal, the interests of the giver and taker collide and it is highly likely that the giver will blow the whistle and the bribe taker will get caught. Jul 19, 2018 in a first, bribe givers to be punished under new anticorruption bill passed by rajya sabha he said the bill has many provisions to ensure speedy trial of corruption cases besides providing protection to bureaucrats, even after their retirement, from malicious complaints. Under the new law proposed by basu, all that the bribe giver will have to establish is that a bribe has been given via a photograph or marked currency notes, etc. Essay on legal action against bribe giver and bribe taker 400 words introduction. Bill seeking equal punishment for bribe giver and taker cleared in lok sabha. The existing law the prevention of corruption act, 1988 penalises only public officials who take a bribe. For instance, it would be wrong to indicate that the bribe taker s motive is greediness as such, without examining causes of appearance of greediness in the personality of the particular bribe taker. When a citizen bribes a bureaucrat, under traditional law the two become partners in crime. Mar 30, 2011 he says that if under the existing system, the bribe giver and the bribe taker are fined x rupees each if caught, under his proposed regime the bribe taker should pay the full amount if caught and. It took a long time, but finally, the government seems to have taken a concrete step against corruption. Both should be punished equally becaise on one hand the bribe taker is taking bribe which is obviously the wrong thing to do and on the other hand the bribe giver is giving bribe and increasing the morale of the bribe taker.
In contrast, leftliberals tend to hold the bribe giver as somehow more reprehensible, as in some way corrupting the taker. He argued that bribery incidents of this kind would be greatly reduced if the bribe giver was not penalized when caught, in contravention of the current law where the bribe taker and bribe giver are equally liable for the crime and hence punishable to the same degree. Cornell professor seeks to legalize bribe giving in india. The legislators moved fast to blacklist and severely penalise the foreign arms supplier. Do you think bribe givers are as guilty as bribe takers. Bribe givers are penalised, but bribe takers are seldom convicted. Legalising harassment bribes is unlikely to work out the way expected. Punishment for those found guilty bribetakers as well bribegivers has been raised from a minimum jail term of 6 months in the original law to. Parliament passes bill to punish bribe givers, along with.
Using a game theory model, it is suggested that such reform will deliberately misalign the incentives of the bribe giver and the bribe taker, leading to the increased detection of bribery. In other hand if anyone want to know more responsible then its clear. If you search the bible for the word bribe and its various forms, you will be surprised i think at how many times it is the subject of scripture. Apr 05, 2011 reducing bribery by legalizing the giving of bribes. To reduce bribery, make it legal marginal revolution. There are two kinds of bribe givers the first group gives bribes actively and readily because it benefits them immensely like nussiness people competing for govt orders or the offenders who bribe to get away from law or any bribing act some for br. The bribe taker, on the other hand, loses the booty of bribe and faces a hefty punishment, he says.
The wicked use bribery against the righteous unholy. Both bribery and bribe takers are equally responsible for the crimes committed by them. Harassment bribe refers to bribes paid by people for getting work done like getting passport,driving licence,ration cards etc. He is convinced legitimizing bribery by the giver will in no way serve as a deterrent. The winwin situation in which both the bribegiver and the bribetaker gain something has not been given enough attention in the literature. One major change proposed initially is penalising the bribe giver and bribe taker on equal terms. Get ready for upsc civil services preliminary exam 2020 with insights insta 75 days revision plan. It concludes that the increased detection of bribery will mould the behaviour of the bribe taker to desist. Wsj report that to reduce bribery we should make the paying of bribes not the demanding. Parliament passes bill to punish bribe givers, along with takers the. Aha i thought to ask this, ok in my opinion we have to punish only the giver. Basu suggested that in the case of harassment bribes,the punishment should be reserved only for the bribe taker and the bribe giver.
Why, for a class of bribes, the act of giving a bribe. May 15, 2011 the reasoning is that once the law is altered in this manner, after the act of bribery is committed, the interests of the bribe giver and the bribe taker will be at divergence. Since the bribe taker knows this, he will be much less inclined to take the. Cornell professor seeks to legalize bribegiving in india. Largely, it is possible to confine oneself to the motive of greediness only in case if a bribe taker tries to satisfy the primary physical needs. Jul 25, 2018 punishment for those found guilty bribe takers as well bribe givers has been raised from a minimum jail term of 6 months in the original law to 3 years, extendable up to 7 years, with a fine.
Bribe giver or bribe taker are equally responsible. It is now possible for the bribe giver to pay the bribe in order to get her work done, and then report the bribe taker and potentially get her bribe money back, after having received the service she was after. Basu suggested that in the case of harassment bribes,the punishment should be reserved only for the bribetaker and the bribegiver must not be penalised at all. According to basu 2011 this asymmetry in punishing only the bribe taker. Punish all the bribe takers and the bribe givers too. Under the current lawthe bribe giver and the bribe taker become partners in crime. Nov 01, 2017 it is a part of corruption named bribery. Legally, there should be a property right to pay a bribe, but not to take one. Secondly, for this model to work the enforcement agencies incentives need to be aligned with those of the law. Mar 27, 2011 since the bribe giver will cooperate with the law,the chances are much higher of the bribe taker getting caught,he added. The guilt of a bribe taker depends solely upon hisher own corrupt intention and the defendant cannot escape conviction upon the ground that the bribe giver had no criminal intentviii. There is something called coercive bribery extortion, coercion.
Here the bribe taker is not the first one to ask, but he creates a situation in which the giver convinces the bribe taker to take something. When both the giver and the taker are happy over a compromise, there is no possibility of the giver. Time to look at the bribegivers the hindu businessline. The suggestions given by kaushik basu on legalising bribegiving are distasteful. The main argument of the paper is that such a change in the law will cause a dramatic drop in the incidence of. Bribegiver set to get equal punishment as bribetaker india news. Indias chief economic adviser kaushik basu argues pdf. If the public servant rejects the offer of bribe, the bribe giver alone can be proceeded against. These incidents indicate that it appears to be possible to draw a line separating the bribe taker from the bribe giver, although only in special cases. Basu concedes that if offering bribes becomes legal and the giver is sure. The previous laws have considered those who give bribe only as abattoirs, which give them a little legal benefit to the bribe, but the anticorruption amendment bill 2018 recognizes the bribe payer who. In a society where corruption is endemic and you want to get something done then it is all too tempting to offer a bribe.
Since the bribe giver will cooperate with the law, the chances are much higher of the bribe taker getting caught. Apr 20, 2011 the chief economic adviser even says where bribery is proved in court, the bribe should be returned to the giver. In both cases, the bribe giver was penalised, but the bribe taker wasnt. Why the anticorruption bill has drawn so much criticism. After a long deliberation, lok sabha has cleared the prevention of.
There is a difference because you are equating for the purpose of punishment a bribe giver, whether it is individual, organisation or corporate entity, and a bribe taker but we know that in our societyextortion takes place. In fact,it will be in the interest of the bribe giver to have the taker get caught,since that way the bribe giver can get back the money she gave as bribe. The bribe giver will be willing to cooperate in getting the bribe taker caught. There was much gossip in the district attorneys office yesterday concerning james a. Many of us believe that the bribe taker is guiltier than the bribe giver. Mar 12, 2018 the bribe giver gets away in this scenario. In other hand if anyone want to know more responsible then its clear that giver is more responsible because when a man not interested to bribe someone. Reducing bribery by legalizing the giving of bribes schneier on. In fact, it will be in the interest of the bribe giver to have the taker get caught, since that way the bribe giver can get back the money he gave as bribe. Our muslims give and take bribes all the time even though their holy book proscribes. For the bribe takers, the bill proposes to increase the punishment to a minimum of three years of imprisonment, which may extend to seven years. Why, for a class of bribes, the act of giving a bribe should be.
Since the courts in italy have established that finmeccanica has given a bribe, it has been blacklisted. In another case, the briber intended to bribe a public servant, but the bribe taker acted in good faith to trap the bribe giver. Bribe giver and taker must be equally exposed to scrutiny. The idea that the bribe taker should be punished while the bribe giver can be tolerated is absurd. Apr 30, 2015 are you ready for insta 75 days revision plan upsc prelims 2020. Apr 01, 2015 legalize bribe giving, double the fine for bribe taking, and make the bribe taker pay back the bribe if discovered. With regard to governmental operations, essentially, bribery is corrupt solicitation, acceptance, or transfer of value in exchange for official action. Bribegiver set to get equal punishment as bribetaker. This is true of the bribe taker and bribe giver relationship as well. Apr 21, 2011 the chief economic adviser even says where bribery is proved in court, the bribe should be returned to the giver. The audit officer, rubul gogoi, caught redhanded accepting the bribe from assistant teacher of kalugaon girls middle english school pranabjyoti bharali, was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three years and six months with a fine of rs 25,000. In case of a bribe offer, both bribe giver and bribe taker are liable to be proceeded against if the public servant accepts the bribe knowing it as an illegal gratification. While it is good to know that the bribe giver in the inx media case is being taken into custody, the bribe receiver karti still roams free. At present, the bribe giver and taker share a collusive bond since.
Such funny ideas bring disrepute to the bureaucracy as a whole. At present, the bribe giver and taker share a collusive bond since both have. This is because indian laws clearly make a criminal of both the bribe giver and the bribe taker. A bribe giver is a person who offers gives money or other valuables to a person in power in order to get some work done. The lok sabha on tuesday passed a bill to amend the antigraft law by seeking to punish bribe givers for the first time along with the bribe takers. Mar 26, 2014 prosecution of the bribe taker in the wake of a conviction or guilty plea by the bribe payer is a rare event. Therefore, the corrupt intent can be personal and not joint in naturevii. Participants in the agitation have no compunctions about admitting they have been bribe. The bribe taker, on the other hand, loses the booty of bribe and faces a hefty punishment. Once the act of giving a bribe is made a legitimate activity,he said,the interests of the bribe giver and the bribe taker will be at divergence. Here the bribe taker is not the first one to ask, but he creates a situation in which the giver convinces the bribetaker to take something.
Hence, in the post bribe situation it is in the interest of the bribe giver to have the bribe taker caught. Heres some very clever thinking from indias chief economic adviser. In fact, it will be in the interest of the bribe giver to have the taker get. In my previous post i talked about how the wicked use false witnesses against the righteous and mentioned that such liars are often recruited with a bribe. Our response to corruption, as individuals and corporates, ranges from outrage to ambivalence. Reducing bribery by legalizing the giving of bribes. Those people who fall prey to such temptations cannot be excused but the temptresses too should be brought to book. She wanted to know why no action was taken against the bribe giver, when on the other hand an action was taken against the bribe taker appellants. In a first, bribe givers to be punished under new anti. Rajya sabha nod to anticorruption bill, opposition. In the way of bribery both are responsible for that. The book was released by home minister p chidambaram here today.
During the hearing the appellant wanted to know whether taking bribe and giving bribe are criminal activities or not, especially, when the bribe giver admits in writing that he has given a bribe. The reasoning is that once the law is altered in this manner, after the act of bribery is committed, the interests of the bribe giver and the bribe taker will be at divergence. Corruption may be a hardy perennial in indian public life, but every once in a while, it bursts into even more exuberant foliage. Mar 31, 2011 indias chief economic adviser kaushik basu argues pdf. Legalization of bribe giving when bribe type is endogenous. We usually assume in a bribe, both the giver of the bribe and taker of the bribe are equally responsible and punished equally as well. Michael levine advocated this in his book deep cover a long time ago. One of the greatest evils we see in so many arenas in the world. Bribery is defined by blacks law dictionary as the offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of any item of value to influence the actions of an official or other person in charge of a public or legal duty.
Economics, princeton university press, princeton, and penguin books, new. In order to reduce bribery, he proposes legalizing the giving of bribes. Mar 01, 2017 there are two kinds of bribe givers the first group gives bribes actively and readily because it benefits them immensely like nussiness people competing for govt orders or the offenders who bribe to get away from law or any bribing act some for br. The wicked use bribery against the righteous unholy charade. It is only the taker of a bribe who should be prosecuted. Perhaps what gets less comment is that all parties to an act of corruption are responsible. Observing that treating both the bribe taker and the bribe giver as liable for corruption creates a large disincentive for citizens to report the transaction, basu proposed that the law should be amended so that only the bribe recipient is liable and prosecuted whereas the giver is offered impunity. Since the bribe taker knows this,he will be much less inclined to. Richmond, expresident of the broadway surface railroad company, richmond was long ago indicted as a bribe giver. But corruption will never be stamped out unless it is acknowledged that the giver is as much to blame as the taker. This should tell us to be wise to this evil and very common tactic. Bribe giver set to get equal punishment as bribe taker.
1183 1087 1141 440 497 567 1261 1140 346 747 448 1045 1588 16 889 290 1635 205 770 245 130 326 407 1536 1150 1340 353 949 1393 925 239 1209 504 1390 1349